<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why use a framework?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://luismajano.com/2010/06/16/why-use-a-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://luismajano.com/2010/06/16/why-use-a-framework/</link>
	<description>Computer Engineer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Majano</title>
		<link>http://luismajano.com/2010/06/16/why-use-a-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Majano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luismajano.com/2010/06/16/why-use-a-framework/#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>Yes, we have actually, and they have started to proof read and rewrite the documentation.  So yes, we are improving as we speak!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we have actually, and they have started to proof read and rewrite the documentation.  So yes, we are improving as we speak!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Winters</title>
		<link>http://luismajano.com/2010/06/16/why-use-a-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Winters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 09:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luismajano.com/2010/06/16/why-use-a-framework/#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>Would you consider the possibility of finding an editor to re-write your documentation?  I know that English isn&#039;t your native language, so I apologize.  However, the single thing which puts me off ColdBox is the turgid, tangled and often almost incomprehensible documentation.  If you could find somebody who can write more clearly, using better English, and without so many spelling and grammatical mistakes, we would have a framework which the CF community could finally embrace as a standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you consider the possibility of finding an editor to re-write your documentation?  I know that English isn&#8217;t your native language, so I apologize.  However, the single thing which puts me off ColdBox is the turgid, tangled and often almost incomprehensible documentation.  If you could find somebody who can write more clearly, using better English, and without so many spelling and grammatical mistakes, we would have a framework which the CF community could finally embrace as a standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Boyer</title>
		<link>http://luismajano.com/2010/06/16/why-use-a-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>David Boyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luismajano.com/2010/06/16/why-use-a-framework/#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I agree with your points about home grown frameworks, which I&#039;ve been guilty of creating a couple.  It&#039;s always harder to test them, they aren&#039;t as proven as the larger frameworks like ColdBox are and when there&#039;s a problem with it you have no choice but to fix it yourself.

I&#039;m definitely in the camp of using a major framework instead for applications now as you have a much larger source of support, more tested and solid code, plus you have the code being improved all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I agree with your points about home grown frameworks, which I&#8217;ve been guilty of creating a couple.  It&#8217;s always harder to test them, they aren&#8217;t as proven as the larger frameworks like ColdBox are and when there&#8217;s a problem with it you have no choice but to fix it yourself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m definitely in the camp of using a major framework instead for applications now as you have a much larger source of support, more tested and solid code, plus you have the code being improved all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

